AI Policies and Compliance for Law Firms
Carrier-ready templates, state bar tracking, and AI sanctions analysis for 5-50 attorney firms. Built for the managing partner whose malpractice renewal is around the corner.
Get notified when state trackers and policy templates launch
No spam. Weekly-ish updates on bar opinions, court sanctions, and what carriers are asking at renewal. Tell us a bit about your firm so we can send you what's relevant to your state and practice size.
State Bar AI Ethics Opinions
We're tracking AI ethics guidance across all 50 states plus DC. Each entry cites the primary source and maps carrier implications. More states rolling out on a weekly cadence — join the waitlist to know when yours lands.
California
informalThe State Bar of California issued practical guidance covering competence, confidentiality, supervision, billing, and ca...
Florida
formalFlorida Bar Ethics Opinion 24-1 requires attorneys to disclose AI use when it affects billing, maintain AI governance po...
View all states →
Recent AI Hallucination Cases
Courts have sanctioned attorneys for submitting AI-generated citations that were fabricated. Over $1.8M in documented sanctions to date across state and federal courts, and the pace is accelerating.
| Case | Court | Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mata v. Avianca, Inc. | S.D.N.Y. | Jun 2023 | $5,000 |
What's coming
- All 50 states + DC — bar opinions, court orders, and state-specific carrier implications
- Named case archive — canonical reference pages for every AI sanctions case
- Policy templates — carrier-ready AI use policies, vendor due diligence checklists, citation verification protocols
- Compliance packet — documentation kit mapped to ABA Formal Opinion 512 and your state's bar guidance